The Big Riddle of the U.N. Climate Conference: If rich nations set up a “fund” to help poorer nations and don’t fund it … is it a fund?

by thenewrepublic

4 comments
  1. Climate activists who have long advocated for a loss and damage fund are now celebrating a huge victory. But they’re also paying close attention to what happens next.

  2. It must be because apparently pledges work the same way. They count even though they aren’t honored.

    Ergo, obviously it’s a fund.

    /s

  3. If we’re predicting future temperatures based on “current commitments” that no country achieves, what are actual future temperatures?

Leave a Reply