Anyone know why NSV is openly allowed to use nazi logos and is still allowed to hold far right riots?

—
StevenStoveMan

14 comments

  1. omdat het op een rode achtergrond is? (en een pijl nogal universeel)

  2. Only disgust for NSV here. And I have no doubt they want to reference it. But an arrow is used for many many things and there is no way anyone can PROVE they mean it as a nazi logo. So no, Nazi logos are not allowed but an arrow an sich is not a nazi logo. innosent untill proven counts for everyone.

  3. Omdat veel mensen aan de top ruggengraatloze wormen zijn of de ernst niet inzien van groepen met nazi sympathieën

  4. As one of the candidates for this ‘remigration’, I’m pretty unsympathetic to the aims of the NSV. 

    However, I think that saying those two symbols are the same is a bit of a stretch 

  5. It still has technical deniability, it’s not originally a Nazi symbol so they can deny that it is

  6. Omschrijf hoe je een pijl zoals op de affiche wilt verbieden, zonder andere pijlen illegaal te maken. Zorg dat de omschrijving van de verboden pijl strikt genoeg is dat pijlen in het algemeen ok zijn, maar ook vaag genoeg dat het de verschillen tussen de pijl op de affiche en de pijl op de wikipedia pagina covert.

  7. Still trying to figure out why they were allowed to go do nazi salutes in Leuven too, must have been fucking terrifying for people on the other end of their violent and racist “opinion” 

  9. Communistische logo’s met twee vlaggetjes mogen dan weer wel natuurlijk.

  12. Because the government and the police side with them. Just because nobody does the investigation work like other countries do, it’s just put under the rug.

  13. Because everything is fine and there’s literally nothing else to worry about. If only they could put some of that energy into fixing the roads.

  14. Because both the Vb and the N-VA have links and roots with ancient nazi collaborators, and because Flanders was very symmpathetic with the German invaders during WW2.

Leave a Reply