However, in a High Court judgment delivered today, Justice Humphreys said the Sands’ legal team had failed to establish Bond was aware of those court proceedings.
He ruled their legal representatives had not properly served a writ on Bond.
“Reliance is placed on a number of evidential factors in support of the proposition that Bond did have such knowledge,” he said. “Ultimately, however, there is no evidence of actual knowledge on the part of Mr Bond.
That’s a phyricc sort of victory.
The Journal A.I. slop
Tattle was never the same after they deleted the GAA WAGs threads.
4 comments
However, in a High Court judgment delivered today, Justice Humphreys said the Sands’ legal team had failed to establish Bond was aware of those court proceedings.
He ruled their legal representatives had not properly served a writ on Bond.
“Reliance is placed on a number of evidential factors in support of the proposition that Bond did have such knowledge,” he said. “Ultimately, however, there is no evidence of actual knowledge on the part of Mr Bond.
That’s a phyricc sort of victory.
The Journal A.I. slop
Tattle was never the same after they deleted the GAA WAGs threads.