• Poore, J. & Nemecek, T. Reducing food’s environmental impacts through producers and consumers. Science 360, 987–992 (2018).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Land Statistics 2001–2022: Global, Regional and Country Trends FAOSTAT Analytical Briefs (FAO, 2024).

  • Summary for Policymakers of the Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES, 2019); https://doi.org/10.1111/padr.12283

  • Newbold, T. et al. Has land use pushed terrestrial biodiversity beyond the planetary boundary? A global assessment. Science 353, 288–291 (2016).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Scherer, L. et al. Global priorities of environmental issues to combat food insecurity and biodiversity loss. Sci. Total Environ. 730, 139096 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Friedlingstein, P. et al. Global carbon budget 2023. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 15, 5301–5369 (2023).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sanderman, J., Hengl, T. & Fiske, G. J. Soil carbon debt of 12,000 years of human land use. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 9575–9580 (2017).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Erb, K. H. et al. Unexpectedly large impact of forest management and grazing on global vegetation biomass. Nature 553, 73–76 (2018).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pörtner, H. O. et al. Scientific outcome of the IPBES–IPCC co-sponsored workshop on biodiversity and climate change. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4659158.IPBES (2021).

  • Pettorelli, N. et al. Time to integrate global climate change and biodiversity science-policy agendas. J. Appl. Ecol. 58, 2384–2393 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bakhtary, H., Palmegiani, I., Ayestas, M. J. R. & Hahn, G. Biodiversity and Climate Action in Agriculture and Food Systems—Opportunities for Building Synergies (Climate Focus, 2024); https://climatefocus.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Biodiversity-and-Climate-Action-in-Agriculture-and-Food-Systems-v5-1.pdf

  • Liu, B., Scherer, L., van Bodegom, P. M., Sun, Z. & Behrens, P. Exploring the spatial relationship between carbon storage and biodiversity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Land Degrad. Dev. 36, 2786–2797 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Strassburg, B. B. N. et al. Global priority areas for ecosystem restoration. Nature 586, 724–729 (2020).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Borrell, J. S. Bending the curve of agricultural expansion offers a new era for biodiversity and climate. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 381, 20240427 (2026).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Beyer, R. M., Hua, F., Martin, P. A., Manica, A. & Rademacher, T. Relocating croplands could drastically reduce the environmental impacts of global food production. Commun. Earth Environ. 3, 49 (2022).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Folberth, C. et al. The global cropland-sparing potential of high-yield farming. Nat. Sustain. 3, 281–289 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Balmford, A. et al. The environmental costs and benefits of high-yield farming. Nat. Sustain. 1, 477–485 (2018).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Molotoks, A. et al. Global projections of future cropland expansion to 2050 and direct impacts on biodiversity and carbon storage. Glob. Change Biol. 24, 5895–5908 (2018).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chaplin-Kramer, R. et al. Spatial patterns of agricultural expansion determine impacts on biodiversity and carbon storage. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 7402–7407 (2015).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Searchinger, T. D. et al. High carbon and biodiversity costs from converting Africa’s wet savannahs to cropland. Nat. Clim. Change https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2584 (2015).

  • Hayek, M. N., Harwatt, H., Ripple, W. J. & Mueller, N. D. The carbon opportunity cost of animal-sourced food production on land. Nat. Sustain. 4, 21–24 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Searchinger, T. D., Wirsenius, S., Beringer, T. & Dumas, P. Assessing the efficiency of changes in land use for mitigating climate change. Nature 564, 249–253 (2018).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Marques, A. et al. Increasing impacts of land use on biodiversity and carbon sequestration driven by population and economic growth. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 628–637 (2019).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Boakes, E. H., Dalin, C., Etard, A. & Newbold, T. Impacts of the global food system on terrestrial biodiversity from land use and climate change. Nat. Commun. 15, 5750 (2024).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yang, X. & Tan, M. Attributing global land carbon loss to regional agricultural and forestry commodity consumption. Environ. Sci. Technol. 55, 823–831 (2021).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sun, Z., Scherer, L., Tukker, A. & Behrens, P. Linking global crop and livestock consumption to local production hotspots. Glob. Food Secur. 25, 100323 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Schmidt-Traub, G. National climate and biodiversity strategies are hamstrung by a lack of maps. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5, 1325–1327 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Green, J. M. H. et al. Linking global drivers of agricultural trade to on-the-ground impacts on biodiversity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 23202–23208 (2019).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sun, Z., Behrens, P., Tukker, A., Bruckner, M. & Scherer, L. Global human consumption threatens key biodiversity areas. Environ. Sci. Technol. 56, 9003–9014 (2022).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Moran, D. & Kanemoto, K. Identifying species threat hotspots from global supply chains. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 23 (2017).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kitzes, J. et al. Consumption-based conservation targeting: linking biodiversity loss to upstream demand through a global wildlife footprint. Conserv. Lett. 10, 531–538 (2017).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sun, Z., Tukker, A. & Behrens, P. Going global to local: connecting top-down accounting and local impacts, a methodological review of spatially explicit input-output approaches. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53, 1048–1062 (2019).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bruckner, M. et al. FABIO—the construction of the food and agriculture biomass input–output model. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53, 11302–11312 (2019).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tang, F. H. M. et al. CROPGRIDS: a global geo-referenced dataset of 173 crops. Sci. Data 11, 413 (2024).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Winkler, K., Fuchs, R., Rounsevell, M. & Herold, M. Global land use changes are four times greater than previously estimated. Nat. Commun. 12, 2501 (2021).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Xu, L. et al. Changes in global terrestrial live biomass over the 21st century. Sci. Adv. 7, eabe9829 (2021).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Scherer, L. et al. Biodiversity impact assessment considering land use intensities and fragmentation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 57, 19612–19623 (2023).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Agrifood Systems: Global, Regional and Country Trends, 2000–2022 FAOSTAT Analytical Brief Series (FAO, 2024).

  • Means, M., Crews, T. & Souza, L. Annual and perennial crop composition impacts on soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics at two different depths. Renew. Agric. Food Syst. 37, 437–444 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Siddique, I. A., Grados, D., Chen, J., Lærke, P. E. & Jørgensen, U. Soil organic carbon stock change following perennialization: a meta-analysis. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 43, 58 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Isbell, F. et al. Benefits of increasing plant diversity in sustainable agroecosystems. J. Ecol. 105, 871–879 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tukiainen, K. et al. Re-evaluating the importance of protein quality: insights on its limited role in multi-nutrient functional units. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 30, 928–938 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Searchinger, T., Waite, R., Hanson, C., Ranganathan, J. & Matthews, E. Creating a Sustainable Food Future: A Menu of Solutions to Feed Nearly 10 Billion People by 2050 (World Resources Institute, 2019).

  • The Future of Food and Agriculture—Alternative Pathways to 2050 (FAO, 2018).

  • Watson, J. E. M. et al. The exceptional value of intact forest ecosystems. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 599–610 (2018).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sun, Z. et al. Dietary change in high-income nations alone can lead to substantial double climate dividend. Nat. Food 3, 29–37 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • The Kunming–Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (Global targets for 2030). CBD https://www.cbd.int/gbf/targets (2024).

  • Dinerstein, E., Joshi, A. R., Vynne, C., Lee, A. T. L. & França, M. A ‘global safety net’ to reverse biodiversity loss and stabilize Earth’s climate. Sci. Adv. 6, 1–14 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Employment Indicators 2000–2022: October 2024 Update FAOSTAT Analytical Briefs (FAO, 2024).

  • Schneider, J. M., Zabel, F., Schünemann, F., Delzeit, R. & Mauser, W. Global cropland could be almost halved: assessment of land saving potentials under different strategies and implications for agricultural markets. PLoS ONE 17, e0263063 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tscharntke, T. et al. Global food security, biodiversity conservation and the future of agricultural intensification. Biol. Conserv. 151, 53–59 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mehrabi, Z., Ellis, E. C. & Ramankutty, N. The challenge of feeding the world while conserving half the planet. Nat. Sustain. 1, 409–412 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Humpenöder, F. et al. Overcoming global inequality is critical for land-based mitigation in line with the Paris Agreement. Nat. Commun. 13, 7453 (2022).

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sun, Z., Behrens, P., Tukker, A., Bruckner, M. & Scherer, L. Shared and environmentally just responsibility for global biodiversity loss. Ecol. Econ. 194, 107339 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • dos Reis, J. C. et al. Integrated crop-livestock systems: a sustainable land-use alternative for food production in the Brazilian Cerrado and Amazon. J. Clean. Prod. 283, 124580 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhu, Y., Wang, Z. & Zhu, X. New reflections on food security and land use strategies based on the evolution of Chinese dietary patterns. Land Use Policy 126, 106520 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mooney, H. et al. Biodiversity, climate change, and ecosystem services. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 1, 46–54 (2009).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Iordan, C.-M. et al. Spatially and taxonomically explicit characterisation factors for greenhouse gas emission impacts on biodiversity. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 198, 107159 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Weiskopf, S. R. et al. Biodiversity loss reduces global terrestrial carbon storage. Nat. Commun. 15, 4354 (2024).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Olson, D. M. et al. Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: a new map of life on Earth. Bioscience 51, 933–938 (2001).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kanemoto, K., Moran, D. & Hertwich, E. G. Mapping the carbon footprint of nations. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50, 10512–10517 (2016).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Food balance sheets. FAO https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/FBS (2023).

  • Geographic regions. UNSD https://unstats.un.org/unsd/methodology/m49/#fn2 (2024).

  • Liu, B., Behrens, P., Sun, Z. & Scherer, L. High-resolution carbon and biodiversity mapping shows correlated losses across space and agricultural products. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14191750 (2026).

  • Bruckner, M. & Kuschnig, N. Food and Agriculture Biomass Input–Output (FABIO) database. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2577067 (2020).

  • Tang, F. H. M. et al. CROPGRIDS. figshare https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.22491997.v7 (2024).

  • Xu, L. et al. Dataset for ‘Changes in Global Terrestrial Live Biomass over the 21st Century’. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4161694 (2021).

  • Scherer, L. et al. Biodiversity impact assessment considering land use intensities and fragmentation. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20617889 (2026).