• Yang L, Liu X, Li Z, Zhang P, Wu B, Wang H, et al. Genetic aetiology of early infant deaths in a neonatal intensive care unit. J Med Genet. 2020;57:169–77.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Meng L, Pammi M, Saronwala A, Magoulas P, Ghazi AR, Vetrini F, et al. Use of exome sequencing for infants in intensive care units: ascertainment of severe single-gene disorders and effect on medical management. JAMA Pediatr. 2017;171:e173438.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tan TY, Dillon OJ, Stark Z, Schofield D, Alam K, Shrestha R, et al. Diagnostic impact and cost-effectiveness of whole-exome sequencing for ambulant children with suspected monogenic conditions. JAMA Pediatr. 2017;171:855–62.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wright CF, FitzPatrick DR, Firth HV. Paediatric genomics: diagnosing rare disease in children. Nat Rev Genet. 2018;19:253–68.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, Bick D, Das S, Gastier-Foster J, et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. 2015;17:405–24.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Clift K, Macklin S, Halverson C, McCormick JB, Abu Dabrh AM, Hines S. Patients’ views on variants of uncertain significance across indications. J Community Genet. 2020;11:139–45.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tsai GJ, Rañola JMO, Smith C, Garrett LT, Bergquist T, Casadei S, et al. Outcomes of 92 patient-driven family studies for reclassification of variants of uncertain significance. Genet Med. 2019;21:1435–42.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • SoRelle JA, Thodeson DM, Arnold S, Gotway G, Park JY. Clinical utility of reinterpreting previously reported genomic epilepsy test results for pediatric patients. JAMA Pediatr. 2019;173:e182302.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • So M-K, Jeong T-D, Lim W, Moon B-I, Paik NS, Kim SC, et al. Reinterpretation of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants of uncertain significance in patients with hereditary breast/ovarian cancer using the ACMG/AMP 2015 guidelines. Breast Cancer. 2019;26:510–9.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bennett JS, Bernhardt M, McBride KL, Reshmi SC, Zmuda E, Kertesz NJ, et al. Reclassification of variants of uncertain significance in children with inherited arrhythmia syndromes is predicted by clinical factors. Pediatr Cardiol. 2019;40:1679–87.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wright M, Menon V, Taylor L, Shashidharan M, Westercamp T, Ternent CA. Factors predicting reclassification of variants of unknown significance. Am J Surg. 2018;216:1148–54.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chen E, Facio FM, Aradhya KW, Rojahn S, Hatchell KE, Aguilar S, et al. Rates and classification of variants of uncertain significance in hereditary disease genetic testing. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6:e2339571.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chourasia N, Vaidya R, Sengupta S, Mefford HC, Wheless J. A Retrospective review of reclassification of variants of uncertain significance in a pediatric epilepsy cohort undergoing genetic panel testing. Pediatr Neurol. 2024;161:101–7.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhang L, Shen M, Shu X, Zhou J, Ding J, Lin H, et al. The recommendation of re-classification of variants of uncertain significance (VUS) in adult genetic disorders patients. J Hum Genet. 2024;69:425–31.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fowler DM, Rehm HL. Will variants of uncertain significance still exist in 2030? Am J Hum Genet. 2024;111:5–10.

  • Tavtigian SV, Harrison SM, Boucher KM, Biesecker LG. Fitting a naturally scaled point system to the ACMG/AMP variant classification guidelines. Hum Mutat. 2020;41:1734–7.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ellard S, Baple EL, Callaway A, Berry I, Forrester N, Turnbull C, et al. ACGS best practice guidelines for variant classification in rare disease 2020. http://www.acgs.uk.com/quality/best-practice-guidelines/.

  • Sequence Variant Interpretation, ClinGen. https://clinicalgenome.org/working-groups/sequence-variant-interpretation/.

  • Zhang J, Yao Y, He H, Shen J. Clinical interpretation of sequence variants. Curr Protoc Hum Genet. 2020;106:e98.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rehm HL, Bale SJ, Bayrak-Toydemir P, Berg JS, Brown KK, Deignan JL, et al. ACMG clinical laboratory standards for next-generation sequencing. Genet Med. 2013;15:733–47.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhu Y, Cao Y, Ma L, Fan L, Pu W, Xia Y. Trichohepatoenteric syndrome and cytomegalovirus infection: case report and literature summary. SAGE Open Med Case Rep. 2024;12:2050313X241248393.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ackerman MJ. Genetic purgatory and the cardiac channelopathies: exposing the variants of uncertain/unknown significance issue. Heart Rhythm. 2015;12:2325–31.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mercati O, Abi Warde M-T, Lina-Granade G, Rio M, Heide S, de Lonlay P, et al. PRPS1 loss-of-function variants, from isolated hearing loss to severe congenital encephalopathy: new cases and literature review. Eur J Med Genet. 2020;63:104033.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ioannidis NM, Rothstein JH, Pejaver V, Middha S, McDonnell SK, Baheti S, et al. REVEL: an ensemble method for predicting the pathogenicity of rare missense variants. Am J Hum Genet. 2016;99:877–85.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pejaver V, Byrne AB, Feng B-J, Pagel KA, Mooney SD, Karchin R, et al. Calibration of computational tools for missense variant pathogenicity classification and ClinGen recommendations for PP3/BP4 criteria. Am J Hum Genet. 2022;109:2163–77.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • He W-B, Xiao W-J, Dai C-L, Wang Y-R, Li X-R, Gong F, et al. RNA splicing analysis contributes to reclassifying variants of uncertain significance and improves the diagnosis of monogenic disorders. J Med Genet. 2022;59:1010–6.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wenger AM, Guturu H, Bernstein JA, Bejerano G. Systematic reanalysis of clinical exome data yields additional diagnoses: implications for providers. Genet Med. 2017;19:209–14.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Macklin SK, Jackson JL, Atwal PS, Hines SL. Physician interpretation of variants of uncertain significance. Fam Cancer. 2019;18:121–6.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cherny S, Olson R, Chiodo K, Balmert LC, Webster G. Changes in genetic variant results over time in pediatric cardiomyopathy and electrophysiology. J Genet Couns. 2021;30:229–36.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • David KL, Best RG, Brenman LM, Bush L, Deignan JL, Flannery D, et al. Patient re-contact after revision of genomic test results: points to consider—a statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG). Genet Med. 2019;21:769–71.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar