Langhammer, P. F. et al. The positive impact of conservation action. Science 384, 453–458 (2024).
UNEP-WCMC & IUCN. Protected Planet Report 2020 (UNEP-WCMC & IUCN, 2021).
The biodiversity plan for life on Earth, 2030 targets (with guidance notes). Convention on Biological Diversity https://www.cbd.int/gbf/targets/ (2023).
United Nations Environment Programme. State of finance for nature: the big nature turnaround – repurposing $7 trillion to combat nature loss. UN Environment Programme https://doi.org/10.59117/20.500.11822/44278 (2023).
zu Ermgassen, S. O. S. E. et al. The current state, opportunities and challenges for upscaling private investment in biodiversity in Europe. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 9, 515–524 (2025).
Scholtens, B. Why finance should care about ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 32, 500–505 (2017).
Medina, C. & Scales, I. R. Finance and biodiversity conservation: insights from rhinoceros conservation and the first wildlife conservation bond. Oryx 58, 90–99 (2024).
WWF. Financing green: unlocking finance for nature and people. WWF https://wwf.panda.org/discover/our_focus/finance/green_financial_solutions/ (2023).
UK Centre for Greening Finance and Investment. UK Centre for Greening Finance & Investment. UK Centre for Greening Finance and Investment https://eng.ox.ac.uk/media/6971/centre-for-greening-finance-investment-outline-optimized.pdf (2021).
Svartzman, R. & Althouse, J. Greening the international monetary system? Not without addressing the political ecology of global imbalances. Rev. Int. Political Econ. 29, 844–869 (2022).
Van Raalte, D. & Ranger, N. Financing nature-based solutions for adaptation at scale: learning from specialised investment managers and nature funds. Global Center on Adaptation and Environmental Change Institute, University of Oxford https://www.eci.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2023-12/Financing_NbS_for_Adaptation-GCAOxford2023-finalv2.pdf (2023).
Matias, G., Cagnacci, F. & Rosalino, L. M. FSC forest certification effects on biodiversity: a global review and meta-analysis. Sci. Total Environ. 908, 168296 (2024).
Morgans, C. L. et al. Evaluating the effectiveness of palm oil certification in delivering multiple sustainability objectives. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 064032 (2018).
Barbier, E. B., Burgess, J. C. & Dean, T. J. How to pay for saving biodiversity. Science 360, 486–488 (2018).
Jouffray, J.-B., Crona, B., Wassénius, E., Bebbington, J. & Scholtens, B. Leverage points in the financial sector for seafood sustainability. Sci. Adv. 5, eaax3324 (2019).
Karolyi, G. A. & Tobin-de la Puente, J. Biodiversity finance: a call for research into financing nature. Financ. Manag. 52, 231–251 (2023).
Meyers, D. et al. Conservation finance: a framework. Conservation Finance Alliance https://landconservationnetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/legacy-files/Conservation+Finance+Framework.pdf5 (2020).
Thompson, B. S. Impact investing in biodiversity conservation with bonds: an analysis of financial and environmental risk. Bus. Strategy Environ. 32, 353–368 (2023).
Flammer, C., Giroux, T. & Heal, G. M. Biodiversity finance. J. Financ. Econ. 164, 103987 (2025).
Cooper, G., & Trémolet, S. Investing in nature: private finance for nature-based resilience. The Nature Conservancy and Environmental Finance https://www.nature.org/content/dam/tnc/nature/en/documents/TNC-INVESTING-IN-NATURE_Report_01.pdf (2019).
Gresham House. Gresham House launches strategy to accelerate restoration of UK biodiversity and enhance natural capital. Gresham House https://greshamhouse.com/news-media/gresham-house-launches-strategy-to-accelerate-restoration-of-uk-biodiversity-and-enhance-natural-capital/ (2024).
Flammer, C. Financing biodiversity through private capital investments. Principles for Responsible Investment https://www.unpri.org/academic-blogs/financing-biodiversity-through-private-capital-investments/11577.article (2023).
Cao, S. S., Karolyi, G. A., Xiong, W. W. & Xu, H. Biodiversity entrepreneurship. Rev. Finance 30, 43–86 (2026).
Li, K., Ortiz-Molina, H. & Zhao, X. Do voting rights affect institutional investment decisions? Evidence from dual-class firms. Financ. Manag. 37, 713–745 (2008).
Baines, J. & Hager, S. B. From passive owners to planet savers? Asset managers, carbon majors and the limits of sustainable finance. Compet. Change 27, 449–471 (2023).
Blackrock. The importance of income to total return. Blackrock https://www.blackrock.com/uk/solutions/investment-trusts/our-range/insights/the-importance-of-income-to-total-return (2026).
Kay, K. A hostile takeover of nature? Placing value in conservation finance. Antipode 50, 164–183 (2018).
Trotta, A. Environmental impact bonds: review, challenges, and perspectives. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 66, 101396 (2024).
Madeira, L. & Gartner, T. Forest resilience bond sparks innovative collaborations between water utilities and wide-ranging stakeholders. J. Am. Water Works Assoc. 110, 42–49 (2018).
Brand, M. W. et al. Environmental impact bonds: a common framework and looking ahead. Environ. Res. Infrastruct. Sustain. 1, 023001 (2021).
Benmelech, E., Kumar, N. & Rajan, R. The decline of secured debt. J. Finance 79, 35–93 (2024).
Lyandres, E. & Zhdanov, A. Convertible debt and investment timing. J. Corp. Finance 24, 21–37 (2014).
Anh, L. N. Q. in Partial Identification in Econometrics and Related Topics (eds Ngoc Thach, N. et al.) 417–435 (Springer, 2024).
International Capital Market Association. Sustainability bond guidelines. International Capital Market Association https://www.icmagroup.org/assets/documents/Sustainable-finance/2021-updates/Sustainability-Bond-Guidelines-June-2021-140621.pdf (2021).
The World Bank. Green, social, sustainability, and sustainability-linked (GSSS) bonds, market update — July 2024. The World Bank https://thedocs.worldbank.org/en/doc/dacb969cc71f53abde2d2758f1cc13ed-0340012024/original/GSSS-Quarterly-Newsletter-Issue-No-8.pdf (2024).
Ministerio de Economía y Finanzas. Uruguay’s Sovereign Sustainability-Linked Bond (SSLB) annual report 2025. Ministerio de Economía y Finanzas https://sslburuguay.mef.gub.uy/innovaportal/file/30672/16/sslb-3rd-annual-report-may-2025_compressed.pdf (2025).
World Bank Group. Wildlife conservation bond boosts South Africa’s efforts to protect black rhinos and support local communities. World Bank Group https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2022/03/23/wildlife-conservation-bond-boosts-south-africa-s-efforts-to-protect-black-rhinos-and-support-local-communities (2022).
World Bank Group. Investors support Amazon reforestation through record breaking USD 225 million World Bank outcome bond. World Bank Group https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2024/08/13/investors-support-amazon-reforestation-through-record-breaking-usd-225-million-world-bank-outcome-bond (2024).
The World Bank. Wildlife Conservation Bond mobilizes private capital to protect critically endangered rhinos. Case study. The World Bank https://thedocs.worldbank.org/en/doc/7039bd837e60e484fb3a93ea63951306-0340022022/original/CaseStudy-WildlifeConservationBond.pdf (2022).
Atlanta Department of Watershed Management. Environmental Impact Bond (EIB) for green infrastructure in Proctor Creek watershed. Atlanta Department of Watershed Management https://www.atlantawatershed.org/environmental-impact-bond/ (2019).
Quantified Ventures. Atlanta: first publicly offered Environmental Impact Bond. Quantified Ventures https://www.quantifiedventures.com/atlanta-eib (2022).
Christiansen, J. et al. Off the charts? Reasons to be skeptical of the growth in biodiversity finance. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 75, 101544 (2025).
Flammer, C. Corporate green bonds. J. Financ. Econ. 142, 499–516 (2021).
Baldi, F. & Pandimiglio, A. The role of ESG scoring and greenwashing risk in explaining the yields of green bonds: a conceptual framework and an econometric analysis. Glob. Finance J. 52, 100711 (2022).
Garvey, J. et al. Designing financial instruments for land-based ecological restoration: a review and future research agenda. Clean. Prod. Lett. 8, 100089 (2025).
International Capital Market Association. Green bond principles: voluntary process guidelines for issuing green bonds. International Capital Market Association https://www.icmagroup.org/assets/documents/Sustainable-finance/2022-updates/Green-Bond-Principles-June-2022-060623.pdf (2021).
International Capital Market Association. Sustainability-Linked Bond Principles. Voluntary process guidelines. International Capital Market Association https://www.icmagroup.org/assets/documents/Sustainable-finance/2024-updates/Sustainability-Linked-Bond-Principles-June-2024.pdf (2024).
Jones, J. P. & Shreedhar, G. The causal revolution in biodiversity conservation. Nat. Hum. Behav. 8, 1236–1239 (2024).
zu Ermgassen, S. O. S. E. et al. Five rules for scientifically credible nature markets. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 10, 181–192 (2026).
Carter, H. et al. Hopes and fears for incentivising coexistence with big cats through innovative market-based financial mechanisms. Wildl. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1002/wll2.70002 (2025).
Biodiversity Credit Alliance. Definition of a biodiversity credit. Issue Paper No. 3. Biodiversity Credit Alliance https://www.biodiversitycreditalliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Definition-of-a-Biodiversity-Credit-Rev-220524.pdf (2024).
Damiens, F. L. P., Porter, L. & Gordon, A. The politics of biodiversity offsetting across time and institutional scales. Nat. Sustain. 4, 170–179 (2021).
Dempsey, J. & Suarez, D. C. Arrested development? The promises and paradoxes of “selling nature to save it”. Ann. Am. Assoc. Geogr. 106, 653–671 (2016).
Marshall, E., Wintle, B. A., Southwell, D. & Kujala, H. What are we measuring? A review of metrics used to describe biodiversity in offsets exchanges. Biol. Conserv. 241, 108250 (2020).
Borges-Matos, C., Maron, M. & Metzger, J. P. A review of condition metrics used in biodiversity offsetting. Environ. Manag. 72, 727–740 (2023).
Wauchope, H. et al. What is a unit of nature? Measurement challenges in the emerging biodiversity credit market. Proc. R. Soc. B 291, 20242353 (2024).
Kim, E. H., Dellecker, A., Field, R., Stephenson, P. & Schrodt, F. Towards high-integrity biodiversity credits: balancing commensurability, ecological complexity and governance. Proc. R. Soc. B 292, 20250990 (2025).
Bull, J. W., Suttle, K. B., Gordon, A., Singh, N. J. & Milner-Gulland, E. Biodiversity offsets in theory and practice. Oryx 47, 369–380 (2013).
Wunder, S. et al. Biodiversity credits: an overview of the current state, future opportunities, and potential pitfalls. Bus. Strategy Environ. 34, 8470–8499 (2025).
Bull, J. W. & Strange, N. The global extent of biodiversity offset implementation under no net loss policies. Nat. Sustain. 1, 790–798 (2018).
Maron, M. et al. ‘Nature positive’ must incorporate, not undermine, the mitigation hierarchy. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 8, 14–17 (2024).
World Economic Forum. Biodiversity credits: demand analysis and market outlook. World Economic Forum https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_2023_Biodiversity_Credits_Demand_Analysis_and_Market_Outlook.pdf (2023).
Vaissière, A.-C. & Levrel, H. Biodiversity offset markets: what are they really? An empirical approach to wetland mitigation banking. Ecol. Econ. 110, 81–88 (2015).
Gordon, A. et al. Five years of offsetting native vegetation: the challenge of achieving no-net-loss. Ecol. Indic. 179, 114180 (2025).
zu Ermgassen, S. O. S. E. et al. Evaluating the impact of biodiversity offsetting on native vegetation. Glob. Change Biol. 29, 4397–4411 (2023).
Gibbons, P., Macintosh, A., Constable, A. L. & Hayashi, K. Outcomes from 10 years of biodiversity offsetting. Glob. Change Biol. 24, e643–e654 (2018).
Duffus, N. E. et al. A globally influential area-condition metric is a poor proxy for invertebrate biodiversity. J. Appl. Ecol. 62, 2529–2540 (2025).
Purvis, A. & Hector, A. Getting the measure of biodiversity. Nature 405, 212–219 (2000).
Convention on Biological Diversity. Biodiversity provides ecosystem goods and services essential to human health and well-being. Convention on Biological Diversity https://www.cbd.int/health/ (2024).
Gonon, M., Svartzman, R. & Althouse, J. Bridging the gap in biodiversity financing: a review of assessments of existing and needed financial flows for biodiversity, and some considerations regarding their limitations and potential ways forward. UCL Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose, Working Paper Series 2024-14. UCL Bartlett Faculty of the Built Environment https://www.ucl.ac.uk/bartlett/publications/2024/oct/bridging-gap-biodiversity-financing (2024).
Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs. Nature Markets Framework progress update March 2024. Policy paper. Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/nature-markets-framework-progress-update-march-2024 (2024).
Jones, J. P. & Lewis, S. L. Forest carbon offsets are failing. Science 381, 830–831 (2023).
Baral, S., Lamichhane, S. & Koirala, A. Current status of improved forest management carbon offset projects in the US voluntary market. For. Policy Econ. 178, 103567 (2025).
Aguirre-Gutiérrez, J., Stevens, N. & Berenguer, E. Valuing the functionality of tropical ecosystems beyond carbon. Trends Ecol. Evol. 38, 1109–1111 (2023).
Zhou, Z. Y. & Almond, D. Biodiversity co-benefits in carbon markets? Evidence from voluntary offset projects. Rev. Finance 30, 537–570 (2026).
van der Gaast, W., Sikkema, R. & Vohrer, M. The contribution of forest carbon credit projects to addressing the climate change challenge. Clim. Policy 18, 42–48 (2018).
Bennett, G. NEW! State Voluntary Carbon Market 2023 finds VCM demand concentrating around pricier, high-integrity credits. Ecosystem Marketplace https://www.ecosystemmarketplace.com/articles/new-state-of-the-voluntary-carbon-markets-2023-finds-vcm-demand-concentrating-around-pricier-high-integrity-credits/ (2024).
Stapp, J. et al. Little evidence of management change in California’s forest offset program. Commun. Earth Environ. 4, 331 (2023).
Engert, J. E. & van Oosterzee, P. Limits to the ability of carbon farming projects to deliver benefits for threatened species. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 9, 134–141 (2025).
New Zealand Forest Service Te Uru Rākau, Ministry for Primary Industries Manatū Ahu Matua. How the ETS applies to forestry. New Zealand Government https://www.mpi.govt.nz/forestry/forestry-in-the-emissions-trading-scheme/about-forestry-in-the-emissions-trading-scheme-ets/how-the-ets-applies-to-forestry/ (2023).
West, T. A., Monge, J. J., Dowling, L. J., Wakelin, S. J. & Gibbs, H. K. Promotion of afforestation in New Zealand’s marginal agricultural lands through payments for environmental services. Ecosyst. Serv. 46, 101212 (2020).
Hong, M. et al. Application of integrated Korean forest growth dynamics model to meet NDC target by considering forest management scenarios and budget. Carbon Balance Manag. 17, 5 (2022).
Sylvera. The state carbon credits. Report. Sylvera https://info.sylvera.com/hubfs/The%20State%20of%20%20Carbon%20Credits%202025%20Report%20-%20Sylvera.pdf?hsLang=en (2026).
Ecosystem Marketplace. State of the voluntary carbon market. Meeting the moment. Renewing trust in carbon finance. Ecosystem Marketplace https://3298623.fs1.hubspotusercontent-na1.net/hubfs/3298623/SOVCM%202025/Ecosystem%20Marketplace%20State%20of%20the%20Voluntary%20Carbon%20Market%202025.pdf (2025).
Jones, J. P. G. Scandal in the voluntary carbon market must not impede tropical forest conservation. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 8, 1203–1204 (2024).
West, T. A. et al. Action needed to make carbon offsets from forest conservation work for climate change mitigation. Science 381, 873–877 (2023).
zu Ermgassen, S. O. S. E., Utamiputri, P., Bennun, L., Edwards, S. & Bull, J. W. The role of “no net loss” policies in conserving biodiversity threatened by the global infrastructure boom. One Earth 1, 305–315 (2019).
Wunder, S. et al. Modest forest and welfare gains from initiatives for reduced emissions from deforestation and forest degradation. Commun. Earth Environ. 5, 394 (2024).
Josefsson, J. et al. Compensating for lost nature values through biodiversity offsetting — where is the evidence? Biol. Conserv. 257, 109117 (2021).
Maron, M. et al. Biodiversity offsets, their effectiveness and their role in a nature positive future. Nat. Rev. Biodivers. 1, 183–196 (2025).
Evans, M. C. et al. Trends in biodiversity finance terminology, actors and networks over two decades. Preprint at SocArXiv https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/awqzp_v1 (2025).
Carton, W., Hougaard, I. M., Markusson, N. & Lund, J. F. Is carbon removal delaying emission reductions? Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Change 14, e826 (2023).
Kedward, K., Zu Ermgassen, S., Ryan-Collins, J. & Wunder, S. Heavy reliance on private finance alone will not deliver conservation goals. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 7, 1339–1342 (2023).
Löfqvist, S., Garrett, R. D. & Ghazoul, J. Incentives and barriers to private finance for forest and landscape restoration. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 7, 707–715 (2023).
Löfqvist, S. & Ghazoul, J. Private funding is essential to leverage forest and landscape restoration at global scales. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 1612–1615 (2019).
Maron, M. et al. Faustian bargains? Restoration realities in the context of biodiversity offset policies. Biol. Conserv. 155, 141–148 (2012).
Dempsey, J. & Bigger, P. Intimate mediations of for-profit conservation finance: waste, improvement, and accumulation. Antipode 51, 517–538 (2019).
Myers, R. et al. Messiness of forest governance: how technical approaches suppress politics in REDD+ and conservation projects. Glob. Environ. Change 50, 314–324 (2018).
Hahn, N. R., Bombaci, S. P. & Wittemyer, G. Identifying conservation technology needs, barriers, and opportunities. Sci. Rep. 12, 4802 (2022).
Brondízio, E. S. et al. Locally based, regionally manifested, and globally relevant: Indigenous and local knowledge, values, and practices for nature. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 46, 481–509 (2021).
Davis, A. & Goldman, M. J. Beyond payments for ecosystem services: considerations of trust, livelihoods and tenure security in community-based conservation projects. Oryx 53, 491–496 (2019).
Zabel, A., Nanhthavong, V. & Epprecht, M. Gaps between demand and supply of biodiversity impact finance in the Global South. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 76, 101568 (2025).
Milner-Gulland, E. Now is the time for conservationists to stand up for social justice. PLoS Biol. 22, e3002657 (2024).
McDermott, M., Mahanty, S. & Schreckenberg, K. Examining equity: a multidimensional framework for assessing equity in payments for ecosystem services. Environ. Sci. Policy 33, 416–427 (2013).
Keith, H., Vardon, M., Stein, J. A., Stein, J. L. & Lindenmayer, D. Ecosystem accounts define explicit and spatial trade-offs for managing natural resources. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 1683–1692 (2017).
Swinfield, T., Shrikanth, S., Bull, J. W., Madhavapeddy, A. & zu Ermgassen, S. O. S. E. Nature-based credit markets at a crossroads. Nat. Sustain. 7, 1217–1220 (2024).
Rampling, E. E., zu Ermgassen, S. O. S. E., Hawkins, I. & Bull, J. W. Achieving biodiversity net gain by addressing governance gaps underpinning ecological compensation policies. Conserv. Biol. 38, e14198 (2024).
Polzin, F., Egli, F., Steffen, B. & Schmidt, T. S. How do policies mobilize private finance for renewable energy?—A systematic review with an investor perspective. Appl. Energy 236, 1249–1268 (2019).
re.green. What we do. re.green https://re.green/en/what-we-do/ (2025).
Segal, M. Microsoft signs forest restoration deal to remove 3.5 million tons of CO2. ESG today https://www.esgtoday.com/microsoft-signs-forest-restoration-deal-to-remove-3-5-million-tons-of-co2/ (2025).
The Conservation Fund. Taxable green bonds (Working Forest Conservation Program), series 2019. The Conservation Fund https://www.conservationfund.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/2019-9-19_TCF_Final_Offering_Memorandum-1.pdf (2019).
The Conservation Fund. Green bond impact report. The Conservation Fund https://www.conservationfund.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/TCF24-Green-Bond-Report-Rebrand-052024-1.pdf (2022).
Flammer, C., Giroux, T. & Heal, G. Blended finance. National Bureau of Economic Research https://www.nber.org/papers/w32287 (2024).
Woodland Carbon Code. What you can buy. Woodland Carbon Code https://woodlandcarboncode.org.uk/buy-carbon/what-are-woodland-carbon-units (2025).
Golub, A. A. et al. Escaping the climate policy uncertainty trap: options contracts for REDD+. Clim. Policy 18, 1227–1234 (2018).
COP 30. Tropical Forests Forever Fund boosts international support and positions itself as a new global model for climate finance. COP 30 https://cop30.br/en/news-about-cop30/tropical-forests-forever-fund-boosts-international-support-and-positions-itself-as-a-new-global-model-for-climate-finance (2025).
Tropical Forest Forever Facility. An innovative financing mechanism to incentivize long-term forest conservation at scale. Concept note 3.0. Tropical Forest Forever Facility https://tfff.earth/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/TFFF-Concept-Note-3.0-202508-FINAL.pdf (2024).
Ceccon, M. Less stage, more handshakes: Climate Week NYC shifts focus from pledges to partnerships. Nature4Climate https://nature4climate.org/less-stage-more-handshakes-climate-week-nyc-shifts-focus-from-pledges-to-partnerships/ (2025).
Macintosh, A. et al. Australian human-induced native forest regeneration carbon offset projects have limited impact on changes in woody vegetation cover and carbon removals. Commun. Earth Environ. 5, 149 (2024).
Sonter, L. J., Barnes, M., Matthews, J. W. & Maron, M. Quantifying habitat losses and gains made by US Species Conservation Banks to improve compensation policies and avoid perverse outcomes. Conserv. Lett. 12, e12629 (2019).
Otten, F., Hein, J., Bondy, H. & Faust, H. Deconstructing sustainable rubber production: contesting narratives in rural Sumatra. J. Land Use Sci. 15, 306–326 (2020).
WWF. WWF & Michelin partnership progress report 2014/2018. WWF https://www.wwf.fr/sites/default/files/doc-2019-07/20190726_Partnership_Pogress_Report_Michelin_WWF-min.pdf (2019).
Ferraro, P. J. Counterfactual thinking and impact evaluation in environmental policy. New Dir. Eval. 2009, 75–84 (2009).
Wauchope, H. S. et al. Evaluating impact using time-series data. Trends Ecol. Evol. 36, 196–205 (2021).
Ferraro, P. J. & Hanauer, M. M. Advances in measuring the environmental and social impacts of environmental programs. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 39, 495–517 (2014).
Jeffries, G., Withers, O., Barichievy, C. & Gordon, C. The rhino impact investment project—a new, outcomes-based finance mechanism for selected AfRSG-rated ‘key’ black rhino populations. Pachyderm 60, 88–95 (2019).
Convergence Finance. TLFF inaugural transaction: corporate sustainability bond for natural rubber production. Convergence Finance https://www.convergence.finance/api/file/5781b6c042d88e7bf518d56945b13b7f:27a34eafd585375a2bd2b910c6bb10b6634617b731653c3b1565216d0421227139f8064021afaffd1470b014b70a0f0bf345a81393c6e59e937230be090278684cbdaf26b22f8e915ae8bf76a10d7a1ff60966953e382f9758c302b21d6dd3d3530b2b83391a3dae6117076518e597d77957d32e056dd56d01f6fe0cc6ac06dd664a3396996623b364a4f8ecd3a542db78828d5c37cff4943e556b945d95a893 (2019).
ADM Capital. Long-term financing for green growth. ADM Capital https://www.admcapital.com/tropical-landscapes-finance-facility/ (2024).
Balmford, A. et al. PACT tropical moist forest accreditation methodology v2. Preprint at Cambridge Open Engage https://doi.org/10.33774/coe-2023-g584d-v5 (2023).
Balmford, A. et al. Time to fix the biodiversity leak. Science 387, 720–722 (2025).
Coldrey, J. J. & Thompson, B. S. Evaluating stakeholder perceptions on drone use in forest restoration using a social–ecological systems framework. People Nat. 6, 1624–1639 (2024).
Ford, H. V. et al. A technological biodiversity monitoring toolkit for biocredits. J. Appl. Ecol. 61, 2007–2019 (2024).
Grace, M. K. et al. Building robust, practicable counterfactuals and scenarios to evaluate the impact of species conservation interventions using inferential approaches. Biol. Conserv. 261, 109259 (2021).
Bull, J. W., Strange, N., Smith, R. J. & Gordon, A. Reconciling multiple counterfactuals when evaluating biodiversity conservation impact in social-ecological systems. Conserv. Biol. 35, 510–521 (2021).
Sharkey, W. et al. The value of qualitative approaches to impact evaluation in biodiversity conservation. Conserv. Sci. Pract. 7, e70102 (2025).
Berkes, F., Folke, C. & Colding, J. Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2000).
Newing, H. et al. Conservation and Human Rights: An Introduction (Interdisciplinary Centre for Conservation Science and Forest Peoples Programme, 2024).
Kigonya, R. Aspirations and Realities of Biodiversity Offsetting: Social and Ecological Transformations of the Gangu Central Forest Reserve in Uganda. PhD thesis, Norwegian Univ. Science and Technology (2024).
Löfqvist, S. et al. How social considerations improve the equity and effectiveness of ecosystem restoration. BioScience 73, 134–148 (2023).
International Advisory Panel on Biodiversity Credits, World Economic Forum. High-level principles to guide the biodiversity credit market. Biodiversity Credit Alliance https://www.biodiversitycreditalliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/BCA_High-level-Principles-to-Guide-the-Biodiversity-Market-working-paper-EN_ES_FR.pdf (2024).
Bidaud, C., Schreckenberg, K. & Jones, J. P. The local costs of biodiversity offsets: comparing standards, policy and practice. Land Use Policy 77, 43–50 (2018).
Tupala, A.-K., Huttunen, S. & Halme, P. Social impacts of biodiversity offsetting: a review. Biol. Conserv. 267, 109431 (2022).
Dickman, A. J. Complexities of conflict: the importance of considering social factors for effectively resolving human–wildlife conflict. Anim. Conserv. 13, 458–466 (2010).
Shackleton, R. T. et al. Navigating power in conservation. Conserv. Sci. Pract. 5, e12877 (2023).
Blake, H. The great cash-for-carbon hustle. The New Yorker (16 October 2023).
Redpath, S. M. et al. Understanding and managing conservation conflicts. Trends Ecol. Evol. 28, 100–109 (2013).
Saif, O., Keane, A. & Staddon, S. Making a case for the consideration of trust, justice, and power in conservation relationships. Conserv. Biol. 36, e13903 (2022).
Dawson, N., Martin, A. & Danielsen, F. Assessing equity in protected area governance: approaches to promote just and effective conservation. Conserv. Lett. 11, e12388 (2018).
Ben, E., Alastair, M. & Max, D. H. Faulty credits tarnish billion-dollar carbon offset seller. Bloomberg https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2023-03-24/carbon-offset-seller-s-forest-protection-projects-questioned?embedded-checkout=true&leadSource=uverify%20wall (2023).
Rakotonarivo, O. S. et al. Resolving land tenure security is essential to deliver forest restoration. Commun. Earth Environ. 4, 179 (2023).
Robinson, B. E. et al. Incorporating land tenure security into conservation. Conserv. Lett. 11, e12383 (2018).
Cavanagh, C. & Benjaminsen, T. A. Virtual nature, violent accumulation: the ‘spectacular failure’ of carbon offsetting at a Ugandan National Park. Geoforum 56, 55–65 (2014).
Lyons, K. & Westoby, P. Carbon colonialism and the new land grab: plantation forestry in Uganda and its livelihood impacts. J. Rural Stud. 36, 13–21 (2014).
Mukpo, A. Report clears Kenyan conservancy of community abuse, but advocates cry foul. Mongabay https://news.mongabay.com/2022/06/report-clears-kenyan-conservancy-of-community-abuse-but-advocates-cry-foul/ (2022).
Gallent, N., Purves, A. & Gabrieli, T. Reflections on ‘land value recovery’ for UK rural areas, and its implications for housing affordability, wealth-building, rural land use, and community wellbeing. Habitat Int. 153, 103204 (2024).
West, P., Igoe, J. & Brockington, D. Parks and peoples: the social impact of protected areas. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 35, 251–277 (2006).
Greenfield, P. The new ‘scramble for Africa’: how a UAE sheikh quietly made carbon deals for forests bigger than UK. The Guardian (30 November 2023).
Chausson, A. et al. Balancing bankability and integrity: fostering investment-ready nature-based solutions. WWF https://www.wwf.org.uk/sites/default/files/2025-03/Balancing-Bankability-and-Integrity-report.pdf (2025).
Poudyal, M. et al. Can REDD+ social safeguards reach the ‘right’ people? Lessons from Madagascar. Glob. Environ. Change 37, 31–42 (2016).
Bond, J. & Mkutu, K. Exploring the hidden costs of human–wildlife conflict in northern Kenya. Afr. Stud. Rev. 61, 33–54 (2018).
Naughton-Treves, L. & Sanderson, S. Property, politics and wildlife conservation. World Dev. 23, 1265–1275 (1995).
Denninger Snyder, K. & Rentsch, D. Rethinking assessment of success of mitigation strategies for elephant-induced crop damage. Conserv. Biol. 34, 829–842 (2020).
Bowie, M. J., Dietrich, T., Cassey, P. & Veríssimo, D. Co-designing behavior change interventions to conserve biodiversity. Conserv. Sci. Pract. 2, e278 (2020).
Fleischman, F. et al. Pitfalls of tree planting show why we need people-centered natural climate solutions. BioScience 70, 947–950 (2020).
Hayes, T., Murtinho, F., Wolff, H., López-Sandoval, M. F. & Salazar, J. Effectiveness of payment for ecosystem services after loss and uncertainty of compensation. Nat. Sustain. 5, 81–88 (2022).
Dawson, N. M. et al. Reviewing the science on 50 years of conservation: knowledge production biases and lessons for practice. Ambio 53, 1395–1413 (2024).
Sinacore, K. et al. Mixed success for carbon payments and subsidies in support of forest restoration in the neotropics. Nat. Commun. 14, 8359 (2023).
Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water. Safeguard Mechanism. Australian Government https://www.dcceew.gov.au/climate-change/emissions-reporting/national-greenhouse-energy-reporting-scheme/safeguard-mechanism (2025).
International Carbon Action Partnership UK. UK emissions trading scheme. International Carbon Action Partnership UK https://icapcarbonaction.com/system/files/ets_pdfs/icap-etsmap-factsheet-99.pdf (2022).
Bleuel, S. & Müller, C. Unlocking the potential: expert insights on the long-term compatibility of forest carbon credits with the EU ETS. For. Policy Econ. 162, 103185 (2024).
Fankhauser, S. What next on net zero? One Earth 4, 1520–1522 (2021).
Trencher, G., Blondeel, M. & Asuka, J. Do all roads lead to Paris? Comparing pathways to net-zero by BP, Shell, Chevron and ExxonMobil. Clim. Change 176, 83 (2023).
Ecosystem Marketplace. New report: the voluntary carbon market contracted in 2023, driven by drop-off in transactions for REDD+ and renewable energy. Ecosystem Marketplace https://www.ecosystemmarketplace.com/articles/report-the-voluntary-carbon-market-contracted-in-2023-driven-by-drop-off-in-transactions-for-redd-and-renewable-energy/ (2024).
Greenfield, P. Revealed: more than 90% of rainforest carbon offsets by biggest certifier are worthless, analysis shows. The Guardian https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/jan/18/revealed-forest-carbon-offsets-biggest-provider-worthless-verra-aoe (18 January 2023).
The Integrity Council for the Voluntary Carbon Market. About the Integrity Council: setting the global standard for high integrity in international carbon markets. The Integrity Council for the Voluntary Carbon Market https://icvcm.org/about-us/ (2025).
Carton, W., Asiyanbi, A., Beck, S., Buck, H. J. & Lund, J. F. Negative emissions and the long history of carbon removal. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Change 11, e671 (2020).
Dooley, K. et al. The Land Gap report 2002. The Land Gap Report https://landgap.org/downloads/2022/2022_Land-Gap-Report_FINAL.pdf (2022).