Baum, M., Erdel, F., Wachsmuth, M. & Rippe, K. Retrieving the intracellular topology from multi-scale protein mobility mapping in living cells. Nat. Commun. 5, 4494 (2014).
Boisvert, F. M., van Koningsbruggen, S., Navascues, J. & Lamond, A. I. The multifunctional nucleolus. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8, 574–585 (2007).
Papantonis, A. & Cook, P. R. Transcription factories: genome organization and gene regulation. Chem. Rev. 113, 8683–8705 (2013).
Geisler, M. S., Kemp, J. P. Jr & Duronio, R. J. Histone locus bodies: a paradigm for how nuclear biomolecular condensates control cell cycle regulated gene expression. Nucleus 14, 2293604 (2023).
Jackson, D. A., Hassan, A. B., Errington, R. J. & Cook, P. R. Visualization of focal sites of transcription within human nuclei. EMBO J. 12, 1059–1065 (1993). The first visualization of discrete RNA polymerase II foci that founded the transcription factory model.
Iborra, F. J., Pombo, A., Jackson, D. A. & Cook, P. R. Active RNA polymerases are localized within discrete transcription ‘factories’ in human nuclei. J. Cell Sci. 109, 1427–1436 (1996).
Osborne, C. S. et al. Active genes dynamically colocalize to shared sites of ongoing transcription. Nat. Genet. 36, 1065–1071 (2004).
Ragoczy, T., Bender, M. A., Telling, A., Byron, R. & Groudine, M. The locus control region is required for association of the murine beta-globin locus with engaged transcription factories during erythroid maturation. Genes Dev. 20, 1447–1457 (2006).
Zhou, G. L. et al. Active chromatin hub of the mouse alpha-globin locus forms in a transcription factory of clustered housekeeping genes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26, 5096–5105 (2006).
Sutherland, H. & Bickmore, W. A. Transcription factories: gene expression in unions? Nat. Rev. Genet. 10, 457–466 (2009).
Hnisz, D., Shrinivas, K., Young, R. A., Chakraborty, A. K. & Sharp, P. A. A phase separation model for transcriptional control. Cell 169, 13–23 (2017). A perspective article introducing the notion of phase separation as a potential mechanism underlying transcriptional activation via enhancers.
Banani, S. F., Lee, H. O., Hyman, A. A. & Rosen, M. K. Biomolecular condensates: organizers of cellular biochemistry. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 18, 285–298 (2017).
Boija, A. et al. Transcription factors activate genes through the phase-separation capacity of their activation domains. Cell 175, 1842–1855.e16 (2018).
Sabari, B. R. et al. Coactivator condensation at super-enhancers links phase separation and gene control. Science 361, eaar3958-17 (2018).
Shrinivas, K. et al. Enhancer features that drive formation of transcriptional condensates. Mol. Cell 75, 549–561.e7 (2019).
Wei, M. T. et al. Nucleated transcriptional condensates amplify gene expression. Nat. Cell Biol. 22, 1187–1196 (2020).
Lu, Y. et al. Phase separation of TAZ compartmentalizes the transcription machinery to promote gene expression. Nat. Cell Biol. 22, 453–464 (2020).
Uversky, V. N. Recent developments in the field of intrinsically disordered proteins: intrinsic disorder-based emergence in cellular biology in light of the physiological and pathological liquid–liquid phase transitions. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 50, 135–156 (2021).
Holehouse, A. S. & Kragelund, B. B. The molecular basis for cellular function of intrinsically disordered protein regions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 25, 187–211 (2024).
Musselman, C. A. & Kutateladze, T. G. Characterization of functional disordered regions within chromatin-associated proteins. iScience 24, 102070 (2021).
Rippe, K. Liquid–liquid phase separation in chromatin. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 14, a040683 (2022).
Jonas, F., Navon, Y. & Barkai, N. Intrinsically disordered regions as facilitators of the transcription factor target search. Nat. Rev. Genet. 26, 424–435 (2025).
Soto, L. F. et al. Compendium of human transcription factor effector domains. Mol. Cell 82, 514–526 (2022). This paper presents a comprehensive catalogue of more than 900 effector domains across ~600 human transcription factors including charge, hydrophobicity, disorder and phosphorylation information.
Mar, M., Nitsenko, K. & Heidarsson, P. O. Multifunctional intrinsically disordered regions in transcription factors. Chemistry 29, e202203369 (2023).
Rippe, K. & Papantonis, A. Functional organization of RNA polymerase II in nuclear subcompartments. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 74, 88–96 (2022).
McSwiggen, D. T., Mir, M., Darzacq, X. & Tjian, R. Evaluating phase separation in live cells: diagnosis, caveats, and functional consequences. Genes Dev. 33, 1619–1634 (2019).
Stortz, M., Presman, D. M. & Levi, V. Transcriptional condensates: a blessing or a curse for gene regulation? Commun. Biol. 7, 187 (2024).
Trojanowski, J. et al. Transcription activation is enhanced by multivalent interactions independent of phase separation. Mol. Cell 82, 1878–1893.e10 (2022). This study shows that assembly of transcription factors into liquid-like droplets has a neutral or even inhibitory effect on transcriptional activation.
Chong, S. et al. Tuning levels of low-complexity domain interactions to modulate endogenous oncogenic transcription. Mol. Cell 82, 2084–2097.e5 (2022). This study shows that increasing intrinsically disordered region (IDR)–IDR interactions of an oncogenic transcription factor to induce phase separation results in the repression of transcription of its endogenous target genes.
Meeussen, J. V. W. et al. Transcription factor clusters enable target search but do not contribute to target gene activation. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, 5449–5468 (2023).
Yang, J. et al. MYC phase separation selectively modulates the transcriptome. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 31, 1567–1579 (2024).
Liu, W. et al. Pcf11/Spt5 condensates stall RNA polymerase II to facilitate termination and piRNA-guided heterochromatin formation. Mol. Cell 85, 929–947.e10 (2025). This paper presents an example of a transcription-related condensate that acts to repress RNA polymerase II activity and promote local heterochromatinization.
Lim, B. & Levine, M. S. Enhancer–promoter communication: hubs or loops? Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 67, 5–9 (2021).
Henninger, J. E. & Young, R. A. An RNA-centric view of transcription and genome organization. Mol. Cell 84, 3627–3643 (2024).
Ugolini, M. et al. Transcription bodies regulate gene expression by sequestering CDK9. Nat. Cell Biol. 26, 604–612 (2024).
Demmerle, J., Hao, S. & Cai, D. Transcriptional condensates and phase separation: condensing information across scales and mechanisms. Nucleus 14, 2213551 (2023).
Forero-Quintero, L. S. et al. Live-cell imaging reveals the spatiotemporal organization of endogenous RNA polymerase II phosphorylation at a single gene. Nat. Commun. 12, 3158 (2021).
Cisse, I. I. et al. Real-time dynamics of RNA polymerase II clustering in live human cells. Science 341, 664–667 (2013).
Zhao, Z. W. et al. Spatial organization of RNA polymerase II inside a mammalian cell nucleus revealed by reflected light-sheet superresolution microscopy. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 681–686 (2014).
Erdel, F. & Rippe, K. Formation of chromatin subcompartments by phase separation. Biophys. J. 114, 2262–2270 (2018).
Muzzopappa, F. et al. Detecting and quantifying liquid–liquid phase separation in living cells by model-free calibrated half-bleaching. Nat. Commun. 13, 7787 (2022).
Jackson, D. A., Iborra, F. J., Manders, E. M. & Cook, P. R. Numbers and organization of RNA polymerases, nascent transcripts, and transcription units in HeLa nuclei. Mol. Biol. Cell 9, 1523–1536 (1998).
Eskiw, C. H., Rapp, A., Carter, D. R. & Cook, P. R. RNA polymerase II activity is located on the surface of protein-rich transcription factories. J. Cell Sci. 121, 1999–2007 (2008).
Pei, G., Lyons, H., Li, P. & Sabari, B. R. Transcription regulation by biomolecular condensates. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 26, 213–236 (2025).
Chen, H. et al. Dynamic interplay between enhancer–promoter topology and gene activity. Nat. Genet. 50, 1296–1303 (2018).
Cho, W. K. et al. Mediator and RNA polymerase II clusters associate in transcription-dependent condensates. Science 361, 412–415 (2018).
Faro-Trindade, I. & Cook, P. R. A conserved organization of transcription during embryonic stem cell differentiation and in cells with high C value. Mol. Biol. Cell 17, 2910–2920 (2006).
Pombo, A. et al. Regional specialization in human nuclei: visualization of discrete sites of transcription by RNA polymerase III. EMBO J. 18, 2241–2253 (1999).
Eskiw, C. H. & Fraser, P. Ultrastructural study of transcription factories in mouse erythroblasts. J. Cell Sci. 124, 3676–3683 (2011).
Papantonis, A. et al. TNFalpha signals through specialized factories where responsive coding and miRNA genes are transcribed. EMBO J. 31, 4404–4414 (2012).
Brown, J. M. et al. Association between active genes occurs at nuclear speckles and is modulated by chromatin environment. J. Cell Biol. 182, 1083–1097 (2008).
Schede, H. H., Natarajan, P., Chakraborty, A. K. & Shrinivas, K. A model for organization and regulation of nuclear condensates by gene activity. Nat. Commun. 14, 4152 (2023).
Cook, P. R. The organization of replication and transcription. Science 284, 1790–1795 (1999).
Kuznetsova, K. et al. Nanog organizes transcription bodies. Curr. Biol. 33, 164–173.e5 (2023).
Melnik, S. et al. The proteomes of transcription factories containing RNA polymerases I, II or III. Nat. Methods 8, 963–968 (2011). Biochemical isolation and characterization of distinct RNA polymerase I-, II- and III-associated supramolecular complexes with distinct and specialized compositions.
Caudron-Herger, M., Cook, P. R., Rippe, K. & Papantonis, A. Dissecting the nascent human transcriptome by analysing the RNA content of transcription factories. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, e95 (2015).
Sabari, B. R., Hyman, A. A. & Hnisz, D. Functional specificity in biomolecular condensates revealed by genetic complementation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 26, 279–290 (2025).
Lee, C. et al. Light-induced targeting enables proteomics on endogenous condensates. Cell 187, 7079–7090.e17 (2024). This paper presents a method for light-induced targeting of endogenous condensates that enables cataloguing of their protein composition.
Huang, S. K., Whitney, P. H., Dutta, S., Shvartsman, S. Y. & Rushlow, C. A. Spatial organization of transcribing loci during early genome activation in Drosophila. Curr. Biol. 31, 5102–5110.e5 (2021).
White, A. E. et al. Drosophila histone locus bodies form by hierarchical recruitment of components. J. Cell Biol. 193, 677–694 (2011).
Kemp, J. P. Jr, Yang, X. C., Dominski, Z., Marzluff, W. F. & Duronio, R. J. Superresolution light microscopy of the Drosophila histone locus body reveals a core–shell organization associated with expression of replication-dependent histone genes. Mol. Biol. Cell 32, 942–955 (2021).
Pancholi, A. et al. RNA polymerase II clusters form in line with surface condensation on regulatory chromatin. Mol. Syst. Biol. 17, e10272 (2021). This study used super-resolution imaging of RNA polymerase II clusters in zebrafish embryos to reveal polymorphic compartments with transcribed chromatin located around a protein-rich and DNA-depleted core.
Castells-Garcia, A. et al. Super resolution microscopy reveals how elongating RNA polymerase II and nascent RNA interact with nucleosome clutches. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, 175–190 (2022).
Hilbert, L. et al. Transcription organizes euchromatin via microphase separation. Nat. Commun. 12, 1360 (2021).
Zhang, S., Ubelmesser, N., Barbieri, M. & Papantonis, A. Enhancer–promoter contact formation requires RNAPII and antagonizes loop extrusion. Nat. Genet. 55, 832–840 (2023). A study establishing that RNA polymerase II is essential for enhancer–promoter looping via high-resolution 3D genomics.
Yang, J. H. & Hansen, A. S. Enhancer selectivity in space and time: from enhancer–promoter interactions to promoter activation. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 25, 574–591 (2024).
Nagashima, R. et al. Single nucleosome imaging reveals loose genome chromatin networks via active RNA polymerase II. J. Cell Biol. 218, 1511–1530 (2019).
Kimura, H., Sugaya, K. & Cook, P. R. The transcription cycle of RNA polymerase II in living cells. J. Cell Biol. 159, 777–782 (2002).
Ghamari, A. et al. In vivo live imaging of RNA polymerase II transcription factories in primary cells. Genes Dev. 27, 767–777 (2013).
Chen, X. et al. Study of RNA polymerase II clustering inside live-cell nuclei using Bayesian nanoscopy. ACS Nano 10, 2447–2454 (2016).
Cho, W. K. et al. RNA polymerase II cluster dynamics predict mRNA output in living cells. eLife 5, e13617 (2016).
Cho, W. K. et al. Super-resolution imaging of fluorescently labeled, endogenous RNA polymerase II in living cells with CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing. Sci. Rep. 6, 35949 (2016).
Basu, S. et al. Unblending of transcriptional condensates in human repeat expansion disease. Cell 181, 1062–1079.e30 (2020). This study found that >20 inherited human disorders are associated with changes in the potential of cell-type-specific transcription factors to form condensates and regulate gene expression.
Lyons, H. et al. Functional partitioning of transcriptional regulators by patterned charge blocks. Cell 186, 327–345.e28 (2023). This study shows MED1-intrinsically disordered region (IDR) condensates selectively partitioning RNA polymerase II with positive regulators for gene activation dependent on patterned charge blocks within their IDRs.
De La Cruz, N. et al. Disorder-mediated interactions target proteins to specific condensates. Mol. Cell 84, 3497–3512.e9 (2024).
Henninger, J. E. et al. RNA-mediated feedback control of transcriptional condensates. Cell 184, 207–225.e24 (2021).
Quinodoz, S. A. et al. RNA promotes the formation of spatial compartments in the nucleus. Cell 184, 5775–5790.e30 (2021).
Asimi, V. et al. Hijacking of transcriptional condensates by endogenous retroviruses. Nat. Genet. 54, 1238–1247 (2022).
Hur, W. et al. CDK-regulated phase separation seeded by histone genes ensures precise growth and function of histone locus bodies. Dev. Cell 54, 379–394.e6 (2020).
Chowdhary, S., Kainth, A. S., Paracha, S., Gross, D. S. & Pincus, D. Inducible transcriptional condensates drive 3D genome reorganization in the heat shock response. Mol. Cell 82, 4386–4399.e7 (2022).
Marenduzzo, D., Finan, K. & Cook, P. R. The depletion attraction: an underappreciated force driving cellular organization. J. Cell Biol. 175, 681–686 (2006).
Shin, Y. et al. Liquid nuclear condensates mechanically sense and restructure the genome. Cell 175, 1481–1491.e13 (2018).
Strom, A. R. et al. Condensate interfacial forces reposition DNA loci and probe chromatin viscoelasticity. Cell 187, 5282–5297.e20 (2024). Together with Shin et al. (2018), this paper shows inducible condensates are used to exert forces on targeted genomic loci and modulate their spatiotemporal interactions, with chromatin behaving like a viscoelastic entity.
Cai, D. et al. Phase separation of YAP reorganizes genome topology for long-term YAP target gene expression. Nat. Cell Biol. 21, 1578–1589 (2019). This study shows that that foci of the endogenous or overexpressed YAZ co-activator recruit RNA polymerase II several minutes after they initially form on chromatin.
Morin, J. A. et al. Sequence-dependent surface condensation of a pioneer transcription factor on DNA. Nat. Phys. 18, 271–276 (2022).
Lewis, B. A., Das, S. K., Jha, R. K. & Levens, D. Self-assembly of promoter DNA and RNA Pol II machinery into transcriptionally active biomolecular condensates. Sci. Adv. 9, eadi4565 (2023).
Koreski, K. P. et al. Drosophila histone locus body assembly and function involves multiple interactions. Mol. Biol. Cell 31, 1525–1537 (2020).
Larkin, J. D., Papantonis, A., Cook, P. R. & Marenduzzo, D. Space exploration by the promoter of a long human gene during one transcription cycle. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, 2216–2227 (2013).
Du, M. et al. Direct observation of a condensate effect on super-enhancer controlled gene bursting. Cell 187, 331–344.e17 (2024).
Mazzocca, M., Fillot, T., Loffreda, A., Gnani, D. & Mazza, D. The needle and the haystack: single molecule tracking to probe the transcription factor search in eukaryotes. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 49, 1121–1132 (2021).
Jana, T., Brodsky, S. & Barkai, N. Speed-specificity trade-offs in the transcription factors search for their genomic binding sites. Trends Genet. 37, 421–432 (2021).
Wei, M. et al. Nuclear actin regulates inducible transcription by enhancing RNA polymerase II clustering. Sci. Adv. 6, eaay6515 (2020).
Langstein-Skora, I. et al. Sequence and chemical specificity define the functional landscape of intrinsically disordered regions. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.02.10.480018 (2024).
Chen, L. et al. Hormone-induced enhancer assembly requires an optimal level of hormone receptor multivalent interactions. Mol. Cell 83, 3438–3456.e12 (2023).
Strom, A. R. et al. Interplay of condensation and chromatin binding underlies BRD4 targeting. Mol. Biol. Cell 35, ar88 (2024).
Yan, K. et al. SGF29 nuclear condensates reinforce cellular aging. Cell Discov. 9, 110 (2023).
Trofimov, K. et al. FER-like iron deficiency-induced transcription factor (FIT) accumulates in nuclear condensates. J. Cell Biol. 223, e202311048 (2024).
Zamudio, A. V. et al. Mediator condensates localize signaling factors to key cell identity genes. Mol. Cell 76, 753–766.e6 (2019).
Hsin, J. P., Sheth, A. & Manley, J. L. RNAP II CTD phosphorylated on threonine-4 is required for histone mRNA 3′ end processing. Science 334, 683–686 (2011).
Papantonis, A. & Oudelaar, A. M. Mechanisms of enhancer-mediated gene activation in the context of the 3D genome. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genom-120423-012301 (2025).
Seufert, I., Vargas, C., Wille, S. J. & Rippe, K. Deregulated enhancer–promoter communication in cancer through altered nuclear architecture. Int. J. Cancer https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.35424 (2025).
Karr, J. P., Ferrie, J. J., Tjian, R. & Darzacq, X. The transcription factor activity gradient (TAG) model: contemplating a contact-independent mechanism for enhancer–promoter communication. Genes Dev. 36, 7–16 (2022).
Jiang, Y. et al. Genome-wide analyses of chromatin interactions after the loss of Pol I, Pol II, and Pol III. Genome Biol. 21, 158 (2020).
El Khattabi, L. et al. A pliable mediator acts as a functional rather than an architectural bridge between promoters and enhancers. Cell 178, 1145–1158.e20 (2019).
Sun, F. et al. The Pol II preinitiation complex (PIC) influences mediator binding but not promoter–enhancer looping. Genes Dev. 35, 1175–1189 (2021).
Hsieh, T. S. et al. Resolving the 3D landscape of transcription-linked mammalian chromatin folding. Mol. Cell 78, 539–553.e8 (2020).
Hug, C. B., Grimaldi, A. G., Kruse, K. & Vaquerizas, J. M. Chromatin architecture emerges during zygotic genome activation independent of transcription. Cell 169, 216–228.e19 (2017).
Rowley, M. J. et al. Evolutionarily conserved principles predict 3D chromatin organization. Mol. Cell 67, 837–852.e7 (2017).
Chahar, S. et al. Transcription induces context-dependent remodeling of chromatin architecture during differentiation. PLoS Biol. 21, e3002424 (2023).
Hoencamp, C. & Rowland, B. D. Genome control by SMC complexes. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 24, 633–650 (2023).
Rao, S. S. P. et al. Cohesin loss eliminates all loop domains. Cell 171, 305–320.e24 (2017).
Aljahani, A. et al. Analysis of sub-kilobase chromatin topology reveals nano-scale regulatory interactions with variable dependence on cohesin and CTCF. Nat. Commun. 13, 2139 (2022).
Goronzy, I. N. et al. Simultaneous mapping of 3D structure and nascent RNAs argues against nuclear compartments that preclude transcription. Cell Rep. 41, 111730 (2022).
Beagrie, R. A. et al. Complex multi-enhancer contacts captured by genome architecture mapping. Nature 543, 519–524 (2017).
Ramasamy, S. et al. The Mediator complex regulates enhancer–promoter interactions. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 30, 991–1000 (2023).
Penagos-Puig, A. et al. RNA polymerase II pausing regulates chromatin organization in erythrocytes. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 30, 1092–1104 (2023).
Papantonis, A. et al. Active RNA polymerases: mobile or immobile molecular machines? PLoS Biol. 8, e1000419 (2010).
Heist, T., Fukaya, T. & Levine, M. Large distances separate coregulated genes in living Drosophila embryos. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 15062–15067 (2019).
Benabdallah, N. S. et al. Decreased enhancer–promoter proximity accompanying enhancer activation. Mol. Cell 76, 473–484.e7 (2019).
Alexander, J. M. et al. Live-cell imaging reveals enhancer-dependent Sox2 transcription in the absence of enhancer proximity. eLife 8, e41769 (2019).
Cheng, L., De, C., Li, J. & Pertsinidis, A. Mechanisms of transcription control by distal enhancers from high-resolution single-gene imaging. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.03.19.533190 (2023).
Kim, Y. J. et al. Light-activated macromolecular phase separation modulates transcription by reconfiguring chromatin interactions. Sci. Adv. 9, eadg1123 (2023).
Wang, W. et al. A histidine cluster determines YY1-compartmentalized coactivators and chromatin elements in phase-separated enhancer clusters. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, 4917–4937 (2022).
Lu, H. et al. Phase-separation mechanism for C-terminal hyperphosphorylation of RNA polymerase II. Nature 558, 318–323 (2018).
Uchino, S. et al. Live imaging of transcription sites using an elongating RNA polymerase II-specific probe. J. Cell Biol. 221, e202104134 (2022).
Lee, R. et al. CTCF-mediated chromatin looping provides a topological framework for the formation of phase-separated transcriptional condensates. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, 207–226 (2022).
Darzacq, X. et al. In vivo dynamics of RNA polymerase II transcription. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 14, 796–806 (2007).
Leidescher, S. et al. Spatial organization of transcribed eukaryotic genes. Nat. Cell Biol. 24, 327–339 (2022).
Espinola, S. M. et al. Cis-regulatory chromatin loops arise before TADs and gene activation, and are independent of cell fate during early Drosophila development. Nat. Genet. 53, 477–486 (2021).
Ladouceur, A. M. et al. Clusters of bacterial RNA polymerase are biomolecular condensates that assemble through liquid–liquid phase separation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 18540–18549 (2020).
de Laat, W. & Grosveld, F. Spatial organization of gene expression: the active chromatin hub. Chr. Res. 11, 447–459 (2003).
Chong, S. et al. Imaging dynamic and selective low-complexity domain interactions that control gene transcription. Science 361, eaar2555-17 (2018). This study observed transcriptionally active transcription factor assemblies and intrinsically disordered region-mediated interactions at physiological concentrations at endogenous chromosomal loci in the absence of phase separation.
Dufourt, J. et al. Temporal control of gene expression by the pioneer factor Zelda through transient interactions in hubs. Nat. Commun. 9, 5194 (2018).
Fallacaro, S. et al. A fine kinetic balance of interactions directs transcription factor hubs to genes. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.04.16.589811 (2024).
Duronio, R. J. & Marzluff, W. F. Coordinating cell cycle-regulated histone gene expression through assembly and function of the histone locus body. RNA Biol. 14, 726–738 (2017).
Christopher, J. A. et al. Subcellular proteomics. Nat. Rev. Methods Primers 1, 32 (2021).
Zhou, Y. et al. RNA damage compartmentalization by DHX9 stress granules. Cell 187, 1701–1718.e28 (2024).
Kar, M. et al. Solutes unmask differences in clustering versus phase separation of FET proteins. Nat. Commun. 15, 4408 (2024).
Mittag, T. & Pappu, R. V. A conceptual framework for understanding phase separation and addressing open questions and challenges. Mol. Cell 82, 2201–2214 (2022).
Holehouse, A. S. & Alberti, S. Molecular determinants of condensate composition. Mol. Cell 85, 290–308 (2025).
Jia, L., Gao, S. & Qiao, Y. Optical control over liquid–liquid phase separation. Small Methods 8, e2301724 (2024).
Erdel, F. et al. Mouse heterochromatin adopts digital compaction states without showing hallmarks of HP1-driven liquid–liquid phase separation. Mol. Cell 78, 236–249.e7 (2020).
Michieletto, D. & Marenda, M. Rheology and viscoelasticity of proteins and nucleic acids condensates. JACS Au 2, 1506–1521 (2022).
Conte, M. et al. Loop-extrusion and polymer phase-separation can co-exist at the single-molecule level to shape chromatin folding. Nat. Commun. 13, 4070 (2022).
Park, J., Kim, J. J. & Ryu, J. K. Mechanism of phase condensation for chromosome architecture and function. Exp. Mol. Med. 56, 809–819 (2024).